Welcome

elcome to the Digital Meltd0wn Music Blog. The aim of this blog is to introduce the readers to music that is out of print, commercially unavailable, released under a creative commons license, or with approval by the featured artist. The majority of the music posted here would be considered underground. Don't let that fool you into thinking that the music featured here might be any less enjoyable than that of the mainstream artists you hear on the radio, as this couldn't be further from the truth. Please keep in mind that the majority of the artists that appear on this blog, along with their respective record labels, are not wealthy and need your support. If you enjoy the material that you find here, please support the artists/labels by purchasing their material afterwards. If you are an artist/label that would prefer to have your material removed from this blog, simply leave me a comment, and I would be more than happy to promptly remove the offending post. In addition to running this blog, I also work on a few other projects during my spare time. You can find links to those, as well as a few other important links associated with Digital Meltd0wn in the menu bar above.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010

"Famous Monsters of Filmland" Magazine - Issues 1-10 (1958-1961


10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great!

#5 is not there though. #6 is repeated.

Thank you!

Zer0_II said...

@Anon: Ahh... finally a comment. I was beginning to wonder why the issues of Creepy and Eerie had been so well received, yet no one had commented on these. Although I suppose the issues of Creepy and Eerie have probably held up better over the years and would be more appealing to a broader range of people these days. Thank you for informing me of the problem with issue #5. I will reupload this tomorrow, and I will include a separate download link for issue #5 so that those who already downloaded the current file won't have to download all of the other issues again just to get issue #5.

Zer0_II said...

@Anonymous: I took a lok at my files. It turns out that I had issue 5 labeled as issue 6, and issue 6 labeled as issue 5. Could someone who downloaded these takea look at your files and verify that this is the case for me, and then report back here? Nevertheless, I decided to go ahead and upload issue #5 for you just in case. You can find it here:

http://www.mediafire.com/?7a7gmfxdlp4x9s6

I am in the process of reuploading both files, with the issues properly labeled this time. I should have those posted tomorrow morning.

Anonymous said...

thank you for posting these! very much appreciated.

Zer0_II said...

I almost forgot to mention that I replaced the original download links. Now issues #5 and #6 are labeled correctly. I'll be posting issues 11-20 either today or tomorrow for those interested.

Anonymous said...

This is bringing my childhood back in a kind of Proustian rush. Thanks for these!

Anonymous said...

issue #13 did not work properly

Zer0_II said...

@Anon: I'm a little confused as to why you didn't mention the problem in the comments section of the other post, but I suppose I'll address the issue in both posts just in case others have trouble with issue #13. Did you try re-downloading the file and extracting it once again? Often times that works. Sometimes .rar files become corrupt simply from the download process. I uploaded issue #13 as a standalone file for you regardless, but if you could let me know if my suggestion works I would greatly appreciate it. If you're not able to re-download it and extract issue #13 as a working file, I will go ahead and replace the entire .rar archive with one that doesn't have any issues. Here is the download link to issue #13:

FamousMonsters of Filmland - Issue #13 (1961 - Warren)

Anonymous said...

Thank you so much for uploading these awesome issues. I noticed that issue 12 has an error. When downloaded it errors out and then shows you a couple of pages from issue 13. Any help with getting issue tweleve would be greatly appreiated. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

i just saw this section first. i re-upped that issue afterward, but it looks like one of the issues (#13, as i recall) is duplicated and labeled as 12?